Page 9 of 9

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 09:30 pm
by Gila
i mean to get back what belongs to them.
and then they can do whatever they want.

as well as releasing the source, a nice option :)

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:32 pm
by frightfan
Gila wrote:i mean to get back what belongs to them.
and then they can do whatever they want.

as well as releasing the source, a nice option :)
??? I already told you what belongs to them: Blood belongs to them. As a matter of fact, even the Blood-specific source code belongs to them, but they made agreement with the publisher (now known as 'Atari') not to release it. So unless Atari ever says "okay", which they won't, Monolith will keep the source code private.

So, in the matter of "Who owns the source code?": Monolith does.
In the matter of "Will they release it?": NO.
And as to the inevitable question of "Why?": because Atari sucks.

Clear as mud now?

Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:24 pm
by DustyStyx
About as clear as the bloated butcher's projectile vomit, yes, thankyou.

Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 04:29 am
by Gila
yea, kthnxbye

Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 08:26 am
by Flagship
Darkest Star wrote:
Rebooter wrote:I haven't been able to get to the WinBlood site for a long time, does anyone know for sure if the project is dead or not?
Looks like the project is dead. :(
Sad, but true... :cry:
:evil: :evil:

Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 10:05 pm
by Radish
In the words of Darth Vader.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!


Not again.